On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > You seem to completely argue besides my point that the replication path > is *more* robust by now? And there's plenty scenarios where a faster > startup is quite crucial for performance. The difference between an > immediate shutdown + recovery without checkpoint to a fast shutdown can > be very large, and that matters a lot for faster postgres updates etc.
If you go that way, it seems safer to me if users had some control with a switch, defaulting to the previous behavior. And a complete switch to the newer behavior could be done later on depending on what has been found. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
