On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> While reading source codes I found the following comment in xlog.c. >> >> /* >> * Have we passed our safe starting point? Note that minRecoveryPoint is >> * known to be incorrectly set if ControlFile->backupEndRequired, until >> * the XLOG_BACKUP_RECORD arrives to advise us of the correct >> * minRecoveryPoint. All we know prior to that is that we're not >> * consistent yet. >> */ >> if (!reachedConsistency && !ControlFile->backupEndRequired && >> minRecoveryPoint <= lastReplayedEndRecPtr && >> XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(ControlFile->backupStartPoint)) >> >> What does XLOG_BACKUP_RECORED means by? I could not find such XLOG info >> value. >> Does it mean XLOG_BACKUP_END? > > This comment is a thinko, it refers to XLOG_BACKUP_END. This comment > block could be reworded a bit, it looks cleaner to me to say > "ControlFile->backupEndRequired is false" instead of just referring to > the variable itself.
Thanks, I agree to use XLOG_BACKUP_END instead. > Worse, the current comment implies that > minRecoveryPoint is incorrectly set if it is true. Bleh. Looking at the condition, we use minRecoveryPoint only when ControlFile->backupEndRequired is *false*. So I guess that it means that minRecoveryPoint is incorrectly set if ControlFile->backupEndReuired is true. Am I missing something? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers