BSD/OS supports: The pthreads library conforms to IEEE Std1003.1c (``POSIX'').
How is that different from UNIX98? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Philip Yarra wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote: > > According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists. > > Thanks for the info - useful to know. > > > lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks > > can be eliminated. > > Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to > be easy to avoid. > > > Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads > > support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after > > all. > > Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it. > > Regards, Philip. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])