On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have any more inputs on this patch and it looks good to me. > So, I'm moving the status to ready for committer.
Thanks! >> At some point it would really make sense to group all things under the >> same banner (64-b LO, pg_basebackup, and now pg_rewind). >> > +1. Implementation-wise, I prefer pg_recvint64 to fe_recvint64. So do I. That's a matter of taste I guess. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
