On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't have any more inputs on this patch and it looks good to me.
> So, I'm moving the status to ready for committer.


>> At some point it would really make sense to group all things under the
>> same banner (64-b LO, pg_basebackup, and now pg_rewind).
> +1. Implementation-wise, I prefer pg_recvint64 to fe_recvint64.

So do I. That's a matter of taste I guess.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to