On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> The attached patch tries to maintain the initial status of B-Tree >> indexes, which are created with equal-key runs in physical order, >> during the whole life of the B-Tree, and make key-tid pairs >> efficiently searchable in the process. > > I don't see an entry for this in the next CF. Do you have a plan for it? > > BTW, I did post some remarks on this patch on another thread recently > [1]. Not sure if any of what I said there is news to you at this > point. > > [1] > postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn=6Lc3OVA88x=E6SKG72ojNUE6ut6RZAqNnQx-YLcw=q...@mail.gmail.com > -- > Peter Geoghegan
Advertising
I plan to restart work on it soonishly, but ATM most of my time is dedicated to the vacuum patch, which is almost done. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
