On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> The attached patch tries to maintain the initial status of B-Tree
>> indexes, which are created with equal-key runs in physical order,
>> during the whole life of the B-Tree, and make key-tid pairs
>> efficiently searchable in the process.
> I don't see an entry for this in the next CF. Do you have a plan for it?
> BTW, I did post some remarks on this patch on another thread recently
> [1]. Not sure if any of what I said there is news to you at this
> point.
> [1] 
> postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn=6Lc3OVA88x=E6SKG72ojNUE6ut6RZAqNnQx-YLcw=q...@mail.gmail.com
> --
> Peter Geoghegan

I plan to restart work on it soonishly, but ATM most of my time is
dedicated to the vacuum patch, which is almost done.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to