On 7/24/17 3:28 PM, David Steele wrote:
Yes, and this is another behavioral change to consider -- one that is more likely to impact users than the change to pg_stop_backup(). If pg_basebackup is not currently waiting for WAL on a standby (but does on a primary) then that's pretty serious.
My bad, before PG10 pg_basebackup did not check that WAL was archived on a primary *or* a standby unless the -x option was specified, as documented.
-- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers