On 7/24/17 3:28 PM, David Steele wrote:

Yes, and this is another behavioral change to consider -- one that is more likely to impact users than the change to pg_stop_backup(). If pg_basebackup is not currently waiting for WAL on a standby (but does on a primary) then that's pretty serious.

My bad, before PG10 pg_basebackup did not check that WAL was archived on a primary *or* a standby unless the -x option was specified, as documented.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to