Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the last seven lines of the file I've marked a part that, when removed,
> makes the problem disappear, which might give a hint.  Besides that, I'm
> clueless.

Looks like I must have broken this as a side-effect of IN-subselect
optimizations --- 7.3 doesn't fail.  Will fix it, thanks for the test
case.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to