On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lat...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Some looking around says that this *isn't* the only place that just > >> blithely assumes that it will find an opfamily entry. But I agree > >> that not checking for that isn't up to project standards. > > > I go thorough the get_opfamily_proc() in the system and added the > > check for InvalidOid. > > Think I did that already, please compare your results with > 278cb4341103e967189997985b09981a73e23a34 > Thanks Tom. > > regards, tom lane > -- Rushabh Lathia
