Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Hmm, yeah, that's not good. However, I didn't like the idea of putting > it inside the locked area, as it's too much code. Instead I added just > before acquiring the spinlock. We cancel the sleep unconditionally > later on if we didn't need to sleep after all.
I just noticed that Jacana failed again in the subscription test, and it looks like it's related to this. I'll take a look tomorrow if no one beats me to it. https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2017-07-26%2014%3A39%3A54 -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers