On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:08:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut > >> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then > >> we'll > >> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other > >> behavior. > >> > >> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the > >> future. The current behavior seems to match that. > > > > I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in > > the perspective of users and PG developers as users. > > Sure that is the correct period to argue.
We've reached that period. If anyone is going to push for a change here, now is the time. Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers