On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:08:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> >> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then 
> >> we'll
> >> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other
> >> behavior.
> >>
> >> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the
> >> future.  The current behavior seems to match that.
> >
> > I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in 
> > the perspective of users and PG developers as users.
> 
> Sure that is the correct period to argue.

We've reached that period.  If anyone is going to push for a change here, now
is the time.  Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to