On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Amit Langote <
langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> > I'm curious what the other limitations are...
>
> When I first wrote that documentation line (I am assuming you're asking
> about "although these have some limitations that normal tables do not"), I
> was thinking about the fact that the core system does not enforce
> (locally) any constraints defined on foreign tables.  Since we allow
> inserting data into partitions directly, it is imperative that we enforce
> the "partition constraint" along with the traditional constraints such as
> NOT NULL and CHECK constraints, which we can do for local table partitions
> but not for foreign table ones.
>
> Anyway, attached patch documents all these limitations about foreign table
> partitions more prominently.
>

​The revised patch down-thread looks good.  Thanks.

I indeed was referring to the paragraph you quoted.

​I would probably just   s/For example/In particular/   and call it good -
or maybe also tell the user that all the limitations are listed in the
notes section for create foreign table (though my first thoughts are all
quite wordy).

David J.

Reply via email to