Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Amit Langote > <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Attached is a patch. I think this could be considered a bug-fix, >> backpatchable to 9.6 which introduced this behavior change .
> I could go either way on that. It's not inconceivable somebody could > be unhappy about seeing this behavior change in a minor release. FWIW, I vote with the camp that this is a clear bug and needs to be fixed. 9.6 broke a behavior that could be relied on before that. We do not normally hesitate to fix regressions in minor releases. (That's not a vote for the patch as submitted; I haven't reviewed it. But we need to fix this.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers