On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 04:09:43PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 8/1/17 00:17, Noah Misch wrote:
>> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
>> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this 
>> > open
>> > item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as 
>> > a
>> > v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>> > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days 
>> > of
>> > this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers 
>> > may
>> > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all 
>> > fixed
>> > well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your 
>> > efforts
>> > toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
>> I'm looking into this now and will report by Friday.
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I think this open item has closed by the commit
7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8 ?


Masahiko Sawada
NTT Open Source Software Center

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to