On 4/26/17 20:14, David Rowley wrote: > On 27 April 2017 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 4/19/17 08:42, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >>> I reviewed the patch. It compiles clean, make check-world passes. I do >>> not see any issue with it. >> >> Looks reasonable. Let's keep it for the next commit fest. > > Thank you to both of you for looking. I'd thought that maybe the new > stuff in PG10 should be fixed before the release. If we waited, and > fix in PG11 then backpatching is more of a pain. > > However, I wasn't careful in the patch to touch only new to PG10 code. > > I'll defer to your better judgment and add to the next 'fest.
committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers