On 4/26/17 20:14, David Rowley wrote:
> On 27 April 2017 at 06:41, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 4/19/17 08:42, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> I reviewed the patch. It compiles clean, make check-world passes. I do
>>> not see any issue with it.
>> Looks reasonable.  Let's keep it for the next commit fest.
> Thank you to both of you for looking. I'd thought that maybe the new
> stuff in PG10 should be fixed before the release. If we waited, and
> fix in PG11 then backpatching is more of a pain.
> However, I wasn't careful in the patch to touch only new to PG10 code.
> I'll defer to your better judgment and add to the next 'fest.


Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to