On 8/16/17 07:27, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Include foreign tables in information_schema.table_privileges >> >> This appears to have been an omission in the original commit >> 0d692a0dc9f. All related information_schema views already include >> foreign tables. >> >> Reported-by: Nicolas Thauvin <nicolas.thau...@dalibo.com> > > I would have been disinclined to back-patch this. Somebody could be > depending on the current behavior, and now we'll end up with two kinds > of clusters, one where initdb was done before these changes and > another where it was done afterward. So nobody will be able to count > on this behavior one way or the other.
I understand that. But this is an additive change, so to speak, so whatever behavior someone was relying on should continue to work. I did not backpatch 9b5140fb503eb50634cd7e080d41f4d9af41e0a6 because that is a behavior-breaking change. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
