On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I think it'd be a good idea to backpatch the addition of
>> TupleDescAttr(tupledesc, n) to make future backpatching easier. What do
>> others think?
> +1
> That would also provide a way for extension developers to be able to
> write code that compiles against PG11 and also earlier releases
> without having to do ugly conditional macros stuff.

Updating only tupdesc.h is harmless, so no real objection to your argument.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to