Hello, Fabien I am attaching patch v7.
> Yes, I agree. a >= 10000 does not make much sense... If you want uniform you > should use random(), not call random_zipfian with a = 10000. Basically it > suggests that too large values of "a" should be rejected. Not sure where to > put the limit, though. I set upper bound for parameter to be equal to 1000. > > Yes, as a general principle I think that the documentation should reflect the > implementation. Documentation have been updated, I have removed algorithms descriptions and put references to them there.
pgbench-zipf-07v.patch
Description: Binary data
— Thanks and Regards, Alik Khilazhev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
