Hi, On 2017-08-29 13:42:05 +0200, Simone Gotti wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Alvaro, > > > Simone Gotti wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I noticed that in postgres 10beta3, calling pg_drop_replication_slot on an > > > active slot will block until it's released instead of returning an error > > > like > > > done in pg 9.6. Since this is a change in the previous behavior and the > > > docs > > > wasn't changed I made a patch to restore the previous behavior. > > > > Changing that behavior was the entire point of the cited commit. > > Sorry, I was thinking that the new behavior was needed for internal > future functions since the doc wasn't changed.
FWIW, I also don't think it's ok to just change the behaviour unconditionally and without a replacement for existing behaviour. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers