On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Thank you for the patch. Regarding to creating the backup history file >>> on stanbys, is there any difference from the patch posted on earlier >>> thread? >> >> That's a rebased version on top of what has been applied, except that >> I have fixed an incorrect comment and shuffled the code building the >> WAL segment name for the stop position. > > Understood, I'll review this patch.
Here is an updated patch with refreshed documentation, as a result of 449338c which was discussed in thread https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d4d951b9-89c0-6bc1-b6ff-d0b2dd5a8...@pgmasters.net. I am just outlining the fact that a backup history file gets created on standbys and that it is archived. -- Michael
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers