> On 08 Apr 2017, at 09:42, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-04-08 2:30 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com > <mailto:peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com>>: > On 4/6/17 14:32, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I like to see any proposals about syntax or implementation. > > > > Using PRAGMA is one variant - introduced by PLpgSQL origin - Ada > > language. The PRAGMA syntax can be used for PRAGMA autonomous with well > > known syntax. It scales well - it supports function, block or command > > level. > > I had pragmas implemented in the original autonomous transactions patch > (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/659a2fce-b6ee-06de-05c0-c8ed6a019...@2ndquadrant.com > > <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/659a2fce-b6ee-06de-05c0-c8ed6a019...@2ndquadrant.com>). > However, the difference there is that the behavior is lexical, specific > to plpgsql, whereas here you are really just selecting run time > behavior. So a GUC, and also something that could apply to other > places, should be considered. > > I'll look there - we coordinate work on that.
This patch was moved to the now started commitfest, and is marked as “Needs review”. Based on this thread I will however change it to "waiting for author”, since there seems to be some open questions. Has there been any new work done on this towards a new design/patch? cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers