> On 05 Sep 2017, at 18:37, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> 
> wrote:
> On 4/25/17 11:00, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Makes sense, assuming a “clean slate” to run on seems a reasonable assumption
>> for the test and it makes for simpler code in PostgresNode.  Updated the 
>> patch
>> which now have static datadir names; retains on PG_TESTS_NOCLEAN or any kind 
>> of
>> test failure; and allows for cleaning datadirs without having to use make 
>> clean
>> (seems the wrong size hammer for that nail).
> Committed.  I had to make some changes in the pg_rewind tests.  Those
> make data directories with conflicting names, which did not work anymore
> because the names are no longer random.

Makes sense, +1 on those changes.

> Other than that this is pretty nice.  Thanks!

Thanks for the commit!

cheers ./daniel

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to