> On 05 Sep 2017, at 18:37, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > On 4/25/17 11:00, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Makes sense, assuming a “clean slate” to run on seems a reasonable assumption >> for the test and it makes for simpler code in PostgresNode. Updated the >> patch >> which now have static datadir names; retains on PG_TESTS_NOCLEAN or any kind >> of >> test failure; and allows for cleaning datadirs without having to use make >> clean >> (seems the wrong size hammer for that nail). > > Committed. I had to make some changes in the pg_rewind tests. Those > make data directories with conflicting names, which did not work anymore > because the names are no longer random.
Makes sense, +1 on those changes. > Other than that this is pretty nice. Thanks! Thanks for the commit! cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers