Simon Riggs <> writes:
> On 7 September 2017 at 11:31, Tom Lane <> wrote:
>> Haas' idea of some kind of syntactic extension, like "LET guc1 = x,
>> guc2 = y FOR statement" seems more feasible to me.  I'm not necessarily
>> wedded to that particular syntax, but I think it has to look like
>> a single-statement construct of some kind.

> Always happy to use a good idea... (any better way to re-locate that
> discussion?)

> Requires a new GUC mode for "statement local" rather than "transaction local"

Yeah, something along that line.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to