On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 12:39:43PM +0200, Adrien Nayrat wrote: > On 07/13/2017 04:36 PM, Adrien Nayrat wrote: > > Hello hackers, > > > > From: Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> > >> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:19:57 -0700 > >> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14722: Segfault in tuplesort_heap_siftup, 32 bit > >> overflow > >> On pgsql-b...@postgresql.org > > > > On 07/06/2017 12:19 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > >> In Postgres 10, tuplesort external sort run merging became much faster > >> following commit 24598337c8d. It might be noticeable if such a machine > >> were using Postgres 10 [...] > > > > Should-we mention this improvement in release notes? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hello, > > After seeing theses slides (especially 52) : > https://speakerdeck.com/peterg/sort-hash-pgconfus-2017 ... > > > > Should we mention it ?
I don't know, but I suggest you read this email thread from April to get an idea of how performance items are handled: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20170425013144.GA7513%40momjian.us#20170425013144.ga7...@momjian.us -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers