> On 08 May 2017, at 12:02, Fabien COELHO <fabien.coe...@mines-paristech.fr> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> Please give a number to submitted patches. I think that this was v3.
> 
> The patch does NOT fix various issues I pointed out in my previous review:
> 
> - tabs introduced in "doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml"
> - too long help line in "src/bin/psql/help.c"
> - spurious space after a comma in "src/fe_utils/print.c"
>   and possibly elsewhere.
> 
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Jan Michálek wrote:
> 
>>>> Markdown include characters/sequences which are interpreted as markers:
>>>> _Italic_, **Bold**, *** => horizontal rules, > block quote... `inline
>>>> code`... If they are interpreted within a table cell then probably they
>>>> should be escaped somehow.
>> 
>> I have treated "_*|<>"
> 
> Probably not enough, see below. Note the escaping chars should also be 
> escaped.
> 
>>> I`m able to sanitize characters, but complex sequences will be problem. I
>>> will look on this, but I don`t know, if I`m able to do this.
> 
> I do not know whether only those are necessary. Have you checked? Guessing is 
> probably not the right approach.
> 
> 
> Concerning MARKDOWN, and according to the following source about github 
> markdown implementation:
> 
>       https://enterprise.github.com/downloads/en/markdown-cheatsheet.pdf
> 
> The following characters may need to be backslash escaped, although it does 
> not cover HTML stuff.
> 
>       \   backslash
>       `   backtick
>       *   asterisk
>       _   underscore
>       {}  curly braces
>       []  square brackets
>       ()  parentheses
>       #   hash mark
>       +   plus sign
>       -   minus sign (hyphen)
>       .   dot
>       !   exclamation
> 
> Another source https://genius.com/3057216 suggests (* # / ( ) [ ] < >),
> which should protect HTML.
> 
> However, the escaping seems to be the backslash character, NOT using html 
> encoding &lt; as done in your version.
> 
> Where did you find the precise escaping rules for markdown? I do not think 
> that it should be invented...
> 
> 
> I have looked at RST, according to this reference:
> 
>       
> http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#grid-tables
> 
> The good news is that you do not need to handle a special | case because you 
> would only produce clean tables.
> 
> I've tested UTF-8 with plane 1 (你好!) and plane 2 (𠀡) and the alignment seems 
> to worked well, incredible!
> 
>>> My main interest on this was in rst. I`m using markdown only in github 
>>> issues and my knowldge about md is poor.
> 
> Then maybe only do RST?!
> 
> It looks much simpler anyway, and if you do MARKDOWN the support needs to be 
> clean.
> 
> About the code:
> 
> I'm still at odds with the code which needs to test for markdown to call for 
> different functions in multiple places. If you keep md and in order to avoid 
> that, I would suggest to extend the pg_wcs* functions with a list of 
> caracters which may have different sizes with additionnal args, say:
> 
>  pg_wcssize(// same args, plus:
>             char * escaped_chars, // will require escaping
>             int escape_len, // how many chars added when escaping
>             int nllen // len of newline if substituted
>             );
> 
> So that pg_wcssize(..., "\r", 1, 1) would behave as before (\n and \t are 
> rather special cases), and the various constants could be held in the format 
> description so the whole thing would be parametric.
> 
> Same approach with format.
> 
> That would allow to simplify the code significantly and to share it between 
> MARKDOWN and others. Also, the multiple "else if" list would be simplified by 
> using strchr or the escaped_chars string.

This patch was moved into the current Commitfest marked “Waiting for author”
with the above review.  Have you had a chance to work on it addressing the
review comments such that we can expect a new version within this CF?

cheers ./daniel

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to