Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Looking into it. I wonder whether we shouldn't just revert this patch altogether. Certainly, extra reads of pg_control are not a noticeable performance problem. I'm now quite worried about whether we aren't introducing hazards of using stale values from the file; if a system crash isn't enough to get it to flush its cache, then what is?
regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers