On 9/16/17 08:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 9/15/17 13:35, Arseny Sher wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> >>> Here is a simple patch that fixes this, based on my original proposal >>> point #4. >> I checked, it passes the tests and solves the problem. However, isn't >> this >> >> + if (slotname || !subenabled) >> >> is a truism? Is it possible that subscription has no slot but still >> enabled? > Yeah, we could just remove the _at_commit() branch entirely. That would > effectively undo the change in 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8, > but I don't see any other choice for now. And the practical impact > would be quite limited.
Fix committed based on this discussion. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
