Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Now, for pg_stat_activity part of the argument why this wouldn't be
>> confusing was that you could also see the "state" field. Maybe we
>> should try to shoehorn equivalent info into the crash log entry?
> Yeah, I think so. Really, I think this is an inadvertency, and thus a
> bug. But instead of just not showing the query when the backend is
> idle, I'd change the display for that case to:
> DETAIL: Failed process was idle; last query was: %s
WFM.
> Or something like that. I guess we'd need another case for a backend
> that crashed without ever running a query.
We already print nothing in that case, which seems fine.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
