On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:30:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "'Bruce Momjian'" <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:22:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> We don't normally release-note documentation changes. If this > >> wasn't purely a documentation change, then I was probably in error > >> to decide it didn't need to be in the notes. > > > It was purely a documentation change, but it was a documented change in a > > long-standing and popular practice of not using too many shared buffers > > on Windows, so I thought it wise to add it. > > Well, if the intent of the note was to encourage people to raise > shared_buffers, it didn't do a very good job of that as written, > because I sure didn't understand it that way.
Do you have any suggestions since it is not a code change that I can point to? My guess is that the limitation was removed years ago, but we only found out recently. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
