On 9/19/17 21:30, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut >>> Personally, I prefer "wal writer", "wal sender" and "wal receiver" >>> that separate words as other process names. But I don't mind leaving >>> them as they are now. >> >> If we were to change those, that would break existing queries for >> pg_stat_activity. That's new in PG10, so we could change it if we were >> really eager. But it's probably not worth bothering. Then again, there >> is pg_stat_wal_receiver. So it's all totally inconsistent. Not sure >> where to go. > > OK, I'm comfortable with as it is now. > > I made this ready for committer. You can fix the following and commit the > patch. Thank you.
Committed. Thank you. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
