On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <
> >> It seems to me that any circle with radius of any Infinity should
> become a
> >> [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity] box.Then you won't have
> >> NaNs, and index structure shouldn't be broken.
> > We probably should produce [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity]
> > box for any geometry containing inf or nan.
> Hm, we can do better in at least some cases, eg for a box ((0,1),(1,inf))
> there's no reason to give up our knowledge of finite bounds for the
> other three boundaries.  But certainly for a NaN circle radius
> what you suggest seems the most sensible thing to do.

OK.  I'll try implement this for circles.

Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Reply via email to