On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > > Hello Masahiko-san, > >>> ISTM that you probably intended "\(.*\)" (actual parenthesis) instead of >>> "(.*)" (memorization) in the data generation message check. >> >> >> Thank you, fixed it. >> >>> Otherwise all is well for me. >>> >> >> Attached the updated version patch. > > > Applies, compiles, make check & tap test ok, doc is fine. > > All is well for me: the feature is useful, code is simple and clean, it is > easy to invoke, easy to extend as well, which I'm planning to do once it > gets in. > > I switched the patch to "Ready for Committers". No doubt they will have > their own opinions about it. Let's wait and see.
Thank you for the reviewing this patch!! Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
