On 26 September 2017 at 00:42, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote: >> Attached is a proposed patch... > > I've taken a look through this and generally agree with it.
Thanks for looking at this. > the bits inside <literal> ... </literal> tags should be > consistently capitalized (you had one case of 'All' that I noticed) Yes, that's a typo. Will fix. > I wonder if it'd be better to have the "simple" description *first* > instead of later on, eg, where you have "Thus the overall result is > that" we might want to try and reword things to decribe it as "Overall, > it works thusly, ..., and the specifics are ...". OK, that makes sense. I'll try it that way round. > That's a relatively minor point, however, and I do feel that this patch > is a definite improvement. Were you thinking of just applying this for > v10, or back-patching all or part of it..? I was planning on back-patching it to 9.5, taking out the parts relating the restrictive policies as appropriate. Currently the 9.5 and 9.6 docs are identical, as are 10 and HEAD, and 9.5/9.6 only differs from 10/HEAD in a couple of places where they mention restrictive policies. IMO we should stick to that, making any improvements available in the back-branches. I was also thinking the same about the new summary table, although I haven't properly reviewed that yet. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers