> On 28 Jul 2017, at 16:46, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Pavan Deolasee > <pavan.deola...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I see your point. But I would like to think this way: does the technology >> significantly help many common use cases, that are currently not addressed >> by HOT? It probably won't help all workloads, that's given. Also, we don't >> have any credible alternative while this patch has progressed quite a lot. >> May be Robert will soon present the pluggable storage/UNDO patch and that >> will cover everything and more that is currently covered by HOT/WARM. That >> will probably make many other things redundant. > > A lot of work is currently being done on this, by multiple people, > mostly not including me, and a lot of good progress is being made. > But it's not exactly ready to ship, nor will it be any time soon. I > think we can run a 1-client pgbench without crashing the server at > this point, if you tweak the configuration a little bit and don't do > anything fancy like, say, try to roll back a transaction. :-)
The discussions in this implies that there is a bit more work on this patch, which also hasn’t moved in the current commitfest, so marking it Returned with Feedback. Please re-submit this work in a future commitfest when ready for a new round of reviews. cheers ./daniel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
