Robert Haas wrote: > I'm potentially willing to commit a patch that just makes the > pg_hypot() -> hypot() change and does nothing else, if there are not > objections to that change, but I want to be sure that we'll know right > away if that turns out to break.
Uh, I thought pg_hypot() was still needed on our oldest supported platforms. Or is hypot() already supported there? If not, I suppose we can keep the HYPOT() macro, and have it use hypot() on platforms that have it and pg_hypot elsewhere? That particular fraction of 0001 seemed a bit dubious to me, as the largest possible source of platform dependency issues. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers