On 10/03/2017 03:00 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> In my llvm jit work I'd to
> #undef PM
> /* include some llvm headers */
> #define PM 1
> because llvm has a number of functions which have an argument named PM.
> Now that works, but it's fairly ugly. Perhaps it would be a good idea to
> name these defines in a manner that's slightly less likely to conflict?
> Alternatively we could use #pragma push_macro() around the includes, but
> that'd be a new dependency.
> Better ideas?
AFAICT at a quick glance these are only used in a couple of files. Maybe
the defs need to be floated off to a different header with more limited
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: