On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
Sorry, my bad. I wasn't aware of this rule. I should have looked at the beginning of the file for any rules. >>> There's no reason why pg_regress couldn't have a >>> --bail-if-group-size-exceeds=N argument, or why we couldn't have a >>> separate Perl script to validate the schedule file as part of the >>> build process. > >> I'd go for the former approach; seems like less new code and fewer cycles >> used to enforce the rule. > > Concretely, how about the attached? (Obviously we'd have to fix > parallel_schedule before committing this.) > Thanks, this will help. May be we should set default to 20 instead of unlimited. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers