Tom Lane wrote: >> But types also have the USAGE privilege for PUBLIC by default: > > Yup, that's an oversight. > >> Hence I propose the attached documentation patch. > > Pushed, with a bit of additional wordsmithing.
Thanks for taking the time. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
