Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote:
>> Sorry for the slow response, but thinking back on this now, the idea of
>> these functions, in my mind at least, was to provide as close to the
>> same output as possible to what pg_controldata outputs.
> I think that's a good goal.
>> So if we make a change here, do we also change pg_controldata?
> I think it would make more sense to leave both as they are and
> consider writing more documentation.
+1. Changing already-shipped behavior seems more disruptive than
this is worth.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
