On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Eric Radman <ericsh...@eradman.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:34:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I thought I had observed cases where the WalReceiver was shut down > without causing XLogCtl->recoveryWakeupLatch to return. If I'm wrong > about this then there's no reason to spin every n seconds.
I would expect a patch to not move the timeout calculation within the loop in recoveryApplyDelay() as you did. > Which record are you suggesting should be forcibly "read again"? The > record identified by XLogCtl->replayEndRecPtr or > XLogCtl->lastReplayedEndRecPtr? I'll look more carefully at such an > approach. I have not looked at how to do that in details, but as the delay is applied for commit WAL records, you would need to make the redo loop look again at this same record once you have switched back to a streaming state. Something to be careful about is that you should not apply the same delay multiple times for the same record. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
