Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see the problem.
I tend to agree with Peter: if dblink is going to start depending on
stuff outside Postgres, it ought to be become a separate project,
if only to simplify distribution and configuration issues.
Perhaps it could be split into two parts, a PG-specific part and
a cross-DBMS part?
regards, tom lane
PS: Has anyone looked any further at the SQL-MED standard? ISTM that's
where we ought to head in the long run.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
