On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > When I tried back-porting the patch to v10 I discovered that the > plpgsql changes conflict heavily and that ripping them out all the way > produces regression failures under force_parallel_mode. I think I see > why that's happening but it's not obvious how to me how to adapt > b73f1b5c29e0ace5a281bc13ce09dea30e1b66de to the v10 code. Do you want > to have a crack at it or should we just leave this as a master-only > fix? >
I think we need to make changes in exec_simple_recheck_plan to make the behavior similar to HEAD. With the attached patch, all tests passed with force_parallel_mode. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
fix_parallel_safety_for_extern_params_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
