On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> According to the spec, the elements of a parenthesized > SET list should be assigned from the fields of a composite RHS. If > there's just one element of the SET list, the RHS should be a single-field > composite value, and this syntax should result in extracting its field. > This patch doesn't do that; it preserves our previous broken behavior, > and thus just puts off the day of reckoning that inevitably will come. > Definitely moderates my opinion in my concurrent email...though postponement is not strictly bad given the seeming frequency of the existing problematic syntax in the wild already. David J.
