Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> Hmm, I'm pretty sure we stress-tested brin in pretty much the same way.
>> But I see this misbehavior too. Looking ...
> Turns out that this is related to concurrent growth of the table while
> the summarization process is scanning -- so new pages have appeared at
> the end of the table after the end point has been determined. It would
> be a pain to determine number of blocks for each range, so I'm looking
> for a simple way to fix it without imposing so much overhead.
Where are we on this --- do you want me to push the brin_doupdate
fix I proposed, or were you intending to merge that into a
larger patch? If I'm to do it, is there a reason not to back-patch
to all branches with BRIN?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
