On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-10-16 16:59:59 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 9/20/17 04:32, Andres Freund wrote: >> > Here's what I roughly was thinking of. I don't quite like the name, and >> > the way the version is specified for libpq (basically just the "raw" >> > integer). >> >> "forced_protocol_version" reads wrong to me. I think >> "force_protocol_version" might be better. Other than that, no issues >> with this concept. > > Yea, I agree. I've read through the patch since, and it struck me as > odd. Not sure how I came up with it...
Andres, could you update the patch? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
