Hi, On November 5, 2017 1:33:24 PM PST, Jim Van Fleet <vanfl...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >Ran this change with hammerdb on a power 8 firestone > >with 2 socket, 20 core >9.6 base -- 451991 NOPM >0926_master -- 464385 NOPM >11_04master -- 449177 NOPM >11_04_patch -- 431423 NOPM >-- two socket patch is a little down from previous base runs > >With one socket >9.6 base -- 393727 NOPM >v10rc1_base -- 350958 NOPM >11_04master -- 306506 NOPM >11_04_patch -- 313179 NOPM >-- one socket 11_04 master is quite a bit down from 9.6 and >v10rc1_base >-- the patch is up a bit over the base > >Net -- the patch is about the same as current base on two socket, and >on >one socket -- consistent with your pgbench (?) findings > >As an aside, it is perhaps a worry that one socket is down over 20% >from >9.6 and over 10% from v10rc1
What query(s) did you measure? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
