On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't remember any more just how much faster qsort_tuple() and > qsort_ssup() are than plain qsort(), but it was significant enough to > convince me to commit 337b6f5ecf05b21b5e997986884d097d60e4e3d0...
IIRC, qsort_ssup() was about 20% faster at the time, while qsort_tuple() was 5% - 10% faster. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
