Hello! > 31 янв. 2016 г., в 17:18, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > написал(а): > > Костя Кузнецов wrote: >> <div>Thank you, Jeff.</div><div>I reworking patch now. All // warning will >> be deleted.</div><div>About memory consumption new version will control size >> of stack and will operate with map of little size because i want delete old >> style vacuum(now if maintenance_work_mem less than needed to build info map >> we use old-style vacuum with logical order).</div> > > You never got around to submitting the updated version of this patch, > and it's been a long time now, so I'm marking it as returned with > feedback for now. Please do submit a new version once you have it, > since this seems to be very useful.
I've rebased patch (see attachment), it seems to work. It still requires a bit of styling, docs and tests, at least. Also, I thinks that hash table is not very good option if we have all pages there: we should either use array or do not fill table for every page. If author and community do not object, I want to continue work on Konstantin's patch. Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
0001-GiST-VACUUM-rebase.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
