> 31 янв. 2016 г., в 17:18, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> 
> написал(а):
> Костя Кузнецов wrote:
>> <div>Thank you, Jeff.</div><div>I reworking patch now. All // warning will 
>> be deleted.</div><div>About memory consumption new version will control size 
>> of stack and will operate with map of little size because i want delete old 
>> style vacuum(now if maintenance_work_mem less than needed to build info map 
>> we use old-style vacuum with logical order).</div>
> You never got around to submitting the updated version of this patch,
> and it's been a long time now, so I'm marking it as returned with
> feedback for now.  Please do submit a new version once you have it,
> since this seems to be very useful.

I've rebased patch (see attachment), it seems to work. It still requires a bit 
of styling, docs and tests, at least.
Also, I thinks that hash table is not very good option if we have all pages 
there: we should either use array or do not fill table for every page.

If author and community do not object, I want to continue work on Konstantin's 

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

Attachment: 0001-GiST-VACUUM-rebase.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to