On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:39:23 -0400 > From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > pgsql-hackers list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature request -- Log Database Name > > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think better would be a GUC "log_to_table" which wrote all standard > > out/err to a pg_log table. of course, I doubt you could make this > > foolproof (how to log startup errors in this table?) but it could be a > > start. > > How would a failed transaction make any entries in such a table? How > would you handle maintenance operations on the table that require > exclusive lock? (vacuum full, reindex, etc) > > It seems possible that you could make this work if you piped stderr to a > buffering process that was itself a database client, and issued INSERTs > to put the rows into the table, and could buffer pending data whenever > someone else had the table locked (eg for vacuum). I'd not care to try > to get backends to do it locally. > > regards, tom lane Not quite, my goal is to have a log per database, the stderr dosn't contain enough information to split it.
As an ISP, I would like that each customer having one or more databases being able to see any error on their database. I imagine have a log file per database would be toot complicated... > -- Olivier PRENANT Tel: +33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) 6, Chemin d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org