Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am marking the completed TODO items.  Are these done?

>       * Have standalone backend read postgresql.conf

[looks] Nope.  No ProcessConfigFile() call in postgres.c.

>       * Prevent whole-row references from leaking memory, e.g. SELECT
>         COUNT(tab.*)

Nope.

>       * Use index to restrict rows returned by multi-key index when used with
>         non-consecutive keys or OR clauses, so fewer heap accesses

Not sure what this means.

>       * Prevent index uniqueness checks when UPDATE does not modify the column

Not done.

>       * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]

I looked at that TODO.detail file, and it all seems to be ancient
history.  Didn't we resolve those issues to peoples' satisfaction in 7.3?

>       o Allow SHOW of non-modifiable variables, like pg_controldata

I put in read-only variables for the things that seemed most interesting
(LC_COLLATE for example), but the coverage isn't complete.

>         o Allow array declarations and other data types in PL/PgSQL DECLARE

AFAIK this is pretty much fixed.

>         o Add PL/PgSQL PROCEDURES that can return multiple values

Not done (unless this is referring to RETURN NEXT, but I think it's
talking about multiple output parameters).

>         o Add table function support to pltcl, plperl, plpython

Not done.

>         o Allow PL/PgSQL to support array element assignment

Done.

>       * Make blind writes go through the file descriptor cache

Not done.

>       * Improve Subplan list handling

Dunno what this is referring to.

>       * Precompile SQL functions to avoid overhead (Neil)

Not done.

>       * Add optional CRC checksum to heap and index pages

Not done.

>         o Add optional textual message to NOTIFY

Not done, but there is room in the FE/BE protocol now for something like
this.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to