--On Friday, August 08, 2003 11:53:34 +0100 Lee Kindness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. Lee: Did you see the patch I posted? Can you help on the configure test(s)I've not been keeping up with the thread re who has what version of getpwuid_r... But just to clarify things the "right" version is:
int getpwuid_r(uid_t uid, struct passwd *pwd, char *buffer, size_t bufsize, struct passwd **result);
documented at:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/getpwuid.html
My email to Bruce which he tacked onto his reply is a good summary of the current problems with the thread stuff.
needed to set HAVE_POSIX_GETPWUID_R?
I **THINK** I did the patch right to handle it if it's set. I forced it for UnixWare
and it seems to work.
LER
L.
Larry Rosenman writes: > > > --On Friday, August 08, 2003 02:10:25 -0400 Bruce Momjian > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Actually, your getpwuid_r is the old, pre-POSIX format. The attached > > email has the configure tests. I was hoping we wouldn't need them, but > > it seems we may. > Err, SCO claims SUSv2, the Single Unix Specification Version 2. V3 > **JUST** came > out. > > I'll look at Lee's stuff. > > > > > > -- > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 >
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend